60 of 60 game(s) had no sportsbook spread available and fell back to straight-up probability.
#1 · 74 pts
Win % (no spread)
KENT @ USF
Kent State Golden Flashes at South Florida Bulls
Pick
South Florida Bulls
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
91.4% (USF)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking South Florida Bulls.
Our model gives USF a predicted 91.4% chance to win outright against KENT. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
USF also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 74 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): USF +5.46 vs KENT -4.44.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for USF, 85.0% for KENT, based on games played so far) → model rating of USF +3.34 vs KENT -10.73.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of +16.6 pts for USF.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 91.4% USF / 8.6% KENT (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: KENT 15.7
– USF 32.3
#2 · 73 pts
Win % (no spread)
FSU @ MIA
Florida State Seminoles at Miami Hurricanes
Pick
Miami Hurricanes
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
90.7% (MIA)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Miami Hurricanes.
Our model gives MIA a predicted 90.7% chance to win outright against FSU. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
MIA also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 73 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): MIA +5.89 vs FSU +1.95.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for MIA, 85.0% for FSU, based on games played so far) → model rating of MIA +13.10 vs FSU -0.36.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of +16.0 pts for MIA.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 90.7% MIA / 9.3% FSU (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: FSU 16.0
– MIA 32.0
#3 · 72 pts
Win % (no spread)
UNM @ HAW
New Mexico Lobos at Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors
Pick
New Mexico Lobos
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
88.0% (UNM)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking New Mexico Lobos.
Our model gives UNM a predicted 88.0% chance to win outright against HAW. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
UNM also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 72 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): HAW +1.00 vs UNM +1.40.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for HAW, 85.0% for UNM, based on games played so far) → model rating of HAW -7.14 vs UNM +9.27.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of -13.9 pts for HAW.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 12.0% HAW / 88.0% UNM (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: UNM 31.0
– HAW 17.0
#4 · 71 pts
Win % (no spread)
WSU @ ORST
Washington State Cougars at Oregon State Beavers
Pick
Oregon State Beavers
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
87.3% (ORST)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Oregon State Beavers.
Our model gives ORST a predicted 87.3% chance to win outright against WSU. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
ORST also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 71 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): ORST -4.96 vs WSU -0.28.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for ORST, 85.0% for WSU, based on games played so far) → model rating of ORST +4.88 vs WSU -6.11.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of +13.5 pts for ORST.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 87.3% ORST / 12.7% WSU (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: WSU 17.3
– ORST 30.7
#5 · 70 pts
Win % (no spread)
ASU @ TTU
Arizona State Sun Devils at Texas Tech Red Raiders
Pick
Texas Tech Red Raiders
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
86.9% (TTU)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Texas Tech Red Raiders.
Our model gives TTU a predicted 86.9% chance to win outright against ASU. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
TTU also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 70 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): TTU +9.17 vs ASU +0.37.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for TTU, 85.0% for ASU, based on games played so far) → model rating of TTU +8.69 vs ASU -2.03.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of +13.2 pts for TTU.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 86.9% TTU / 13.1% ASU (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: ASU 17.4
– TTU 30.6
#6 · 69 pts
Win % (no spread)
UTAH @ COLO
Utah Utes at Colorado Buffaloes
Pick
Utah Utes
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
85.7% (UTAH)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Utah Utes.
Our model gives UTAH a predicted 85.7% chance to win outright against COLO. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
UTAH also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 69 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): COLO -4.12 vs UTAH +6.44.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for COLO, 85.0% for UTAH, based on games played so far) → model rating of COLO -5.21 vs UTAH +9.79.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of -12.5 pts for COLO.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 14.3% COLO / 85.7% UTAH (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: UTAH 30.3
– COLO 17.7
#7 · 68 pts
Win % (no spread)
LT @ ULM
Louisiana Tech Bulldogs at UL Monroe Warhawks
Pick
Louisiana Tech Bulldogs
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
85.3% (LT)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Louisiana Tech Bulldogs.
Our model gives LT a predicted 85.3% chance to win outright against ULM. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
LT also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 68 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): ULM -5.88 vs LT +1.04.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for ULM, 85.0% for LT, based on games played so far) → model rating of ULM -12.67 vs LT +2.13.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of -12.3 pts for ULM.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 14.7% ULM / 85.3% LT (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: LT 30.1
– ULM 17.9
#8 · 67 pts
Win % (no spread)
AUB @ UGA
Auburn Tigers at Georgia Bulldogs
Pick
Georgia Bulldogs
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
83.9% (UGA)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Georgia Bulldogs.
Our model gives UGA a predicted 83.9% chance to win outright against AUB. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
UGA also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 67 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): UGA +5.06 vs AUB +0.66.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for UGA, 85.0% for AUB, based on games played so far) → model rating of UGA +9.74 vs AUB +0.71.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of +11.5 pts for UGA.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 83.9% UGA / 16.1% AUB (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: AUB 18.2
– UGA 29.8
#9 · 66 pts
Win % (no spread)
GAST @ JMU
Georgia State Panthers at James Madison Dukes
Pick
James Madison Dukes
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
83.0% (JMU)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking James Madison Dukes.
Our model gives JMU a predicted 83.0% chance to win outright against GAST. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
JMU also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 66 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): JMU +6.37 vs GAST -6.97.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for JMU, 85.0% for GAST, based on games played so far) → model rating of JMU +10.46 vs GAST +1.85.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of +11.1 pts for JMU.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 83.0% JMU / 17.0% GAST (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: GAST 18.4
– JMU 29.6
#10 · 65 pts
Win % (no spread)
NIU @ WYO
Northern Illinois Huskies at Wyoming Cowboys
Pick
Wyoming Cowboys
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
82.9% (WYO)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Wyoming Cowboys.
Our model gives WYO a predicted 82.9% chance to win outright against NIU. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
WYO also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 65 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): WYO -2.77 vs NIU -3.83.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for WYO, 85.0% for NIU, based on games played so far) → model rating of WYO -3.69 vs NIU -12.26.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of +11.1 pts for WYO.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 82.9% WYO / 17.1% NIU (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: NIU 18.5
– WYO 29.5
#11 · 64 pts
Win % (no spread)
NEV @ NDSU
Nevada Wolf Pack at North Dakota State Bison
Pick
North Dakota State Bison
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
82.9% (NDSU)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking North Dakota State Bison.
Our model gives NDSU a predicted 82.9% chance to win outright against NEV. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
NDSU also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 64 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): NDSU +0.00 vs NEV -4.35.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for NDSU, 85.0% for NEV, based on games played so far) → model rating of NDSU +5.61 vs NEV -2.93.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of +11.0 pts for NDSU.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 82.9% NDSU / 17.1% NEV (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: NEV 18.5
– NDSU 29.5
#12 · 63 pts
Win % (no spread)
CLT @ TEM
Charlotte 49ers at Temple Owls
Pick
Temple Owls
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
82.1% (TEM)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Temple Owls.
Our model gives TEM a predicted 82.1% chance to win outright against CLT. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
TEM also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 63 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): TEM -1.56 vs CLT -8.09.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for TEM, 85.0% for CLT, based on games played so far) → model rating of TEM -4.08 vs CLT -12.24.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of +10.7 pts for TEM.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 82.1% TEM / 17.9% CLT (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: CLT 18.7
– TEM 29.3
#14 · 61 pts
Win % (no spread)
MSST @ LSU
Mississippi State Bulldogs at LSU Tigers
Pick
LSU Tigers
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
81.0% (LSU)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking LSU Tigers.
Our model gives LSU a predicted 81.0% chance to win outright against MSST. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
LSU also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 61 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): LSU +0.59 vs MSST -0.50.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for LSU, 85.0% for MSST, based on games played so far) → model rating of LSU +7.86 vs MSST +0.22.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of +10.1 pts for LSU.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 81.0% LSU / 19.0% MSST (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: MSST 18.9
– LSU 29.1
#15 · 60 pts
Win % (no spread)
AKR @ M-OH
Akron Zips at Miami (OH) RedHawks
Pick
Miami (OH) RedHawks
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
80.9% (M-OH)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Miami (OH) RedHawks.
Our model gives M-OH a predicted 80.9% chance to win outright against AKR. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
M-OH also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 60 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): M-OH +0.06 vs AKR -2.73.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for M-OH, 85.0% for AKR, based on games played so far) → model rating of M-OH -1.42 vs AKR -9.04.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of +10.1 pts for M-OH.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 80.9% M-OH / 19.1% AKR (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: AKR 18.9
– M-OH 29.1
#16 · 59 pts
Win % (no spread)
OHIO @ SAC
Ohio Bobcats at Sacramento State Hornets
Pick
Ohio Bobcats
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
78.8% (OHIO)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Ohio Bobcats.
Our model gives OHIO a predicted 78.8% chance to win outright against SAC. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
OHIO also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 59 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): SAC +0.00 vs OHIO +1.13.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for SAC, 85.0% for OHIO, based on games played so far) → model rating of SAC -10.05 vs OHIO +1.63.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of -9.2 pts for SAC.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 21.2% SAC / 78.8% OHIO (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: OHIO 28.6
– SAC 19.4
#17 · 58 pts
Win % (no spread)
CSU @ TXST
Colorado State Rams at Texas State Bobcats
Pick
Texas State Bobcats
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
78.7% (TXST)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Texas State Bobcats.
Our model gives TXST a predicted 78.7% chance to win outright against CSU. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
TXST also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 58 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): TXST +0.71 vs CSU -5.19.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for TXST, 85.0% for CSU, based on games played so far) → model rating of TXST +0.87 vs CSU -5.79.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of +9.2 pts for TXST.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 78.7% TXST / 21.3% CSU (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: CSU 19.4
– TXST 28.6
#18 · 57 pts
Win % (no spread)
GT @ VT
Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets at Virginia Tech Hokies
Pick
Virginia Tech Hokies
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
78.1% (VT)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Virginia Tech Hokies.
Our model gives VT a predicted 78.1% chance to win outright against GT. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
VT also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 57 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): VT -3.79 vs GT +2.23.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for VT, 85.0% for GT, based on games played so far) → model rating of VT +3.71 vs GT -2.67.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of +8.9 pts for VT.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 78.1% VT / 21.9% GT (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: GT 19.6
– VT 28.4
#19 · 56 pts
Win % (no spread)
TROY @ UL
Troy Trojans at Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns
Pick
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
74.6% (UL)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns.
Our model gives UL a predicted 74.6% chance to win outright against TROY. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
UL also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 56 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): UL -1.62 vs TROY -0.47.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for UL, 85.0% for TROY, based on games played so far) → model rating of UL +2.16 vs TROY -2.88.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of +7.5 pts for UL.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 74.6% UL / 25.4% TROY (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: TROY 20.2
– UL 27.8
#20 · 55 pts
Win % (no spread)
WAKE @ CAL
Wake Forest Demon Deacons at California Golden Bears
Pick
Wake Forest Demon Deacons
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
73.5% (WAKE)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Wake Forest Demon Deacons.
Our model gives WAKE a predicted 73.5% chance to win outright against CAL. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
WAKE also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 55 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): CAL -1.02 vs WAKE +1.21.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for CAL, 85.0% for WAKE, based on games played so far) → model rating of CAL -3.68 vs WAKE +5.97.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of -7.2 pts for CAL.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 26.5% CAL / 73.5% WAKE (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: WAKE 27.6
– CAL 20.4
#21 · 54 pts
Win % (no spread)
NU @ MSU
Northwestern Wildcats at Michigan State Spartans
Pick
Northwestern Wildcats
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
73.4% (NU)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Northwestern Wildcats.
Our model gives NU a predicted 73.4% chance to win outright against MSU. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
NU also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 54 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): MSU -2.68 vs NU -0.39.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for MSU, 85.0% for NU, based on games played so far) → model rating of MSU -4.64 vs NU +4.96.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of -7.1 pts for MSU.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 26.6% MSU / 73.4% NU (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: NU 27.5
– MSU 20.5
#23 · 52 pts
Win % (no spread)
FAU @ ARMY
Florida Atlantic Owls at Army Black Knights
Pick
Army Black Knights
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
72.7% (ARMY)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Army Black Knights.
Our model gives ARMY a predicted 72.7% chance to win outright against FAU. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
ARMY also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 52 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): ARMY -0.79 vs FAU -3.07.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for ARMY, 85.0% for FAU, based on games played so far) → model rating of ARMY +3.76 vs FAU -0.60.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of +6.9 pts for ARMY.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 72.7% ARMY / 27.3% FAU (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: FAU 20.6
– ARMY 27.4
#24 · 51 pts
Win % (no spread)
UNLV @ AFA
UNLV Rebels at Air Force Falcons
Pick
Air Force Falcons
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
72.5% (AFA)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Air Force Falcons.
Our model gives AFA a predicted 72.5% chance to win outright against UNLV. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
AFA also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 51 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): AFA -1.46 vs UNLV +1.97.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for AFA, 85.0% for UNLV, based on games played so far) → model rating of AFA +2.87 vs UNLV -1.41.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of +6.8 pts for AFA.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 72.5% AFA / 27.5% UNLV (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: UNLV 20.6
– AFA 27.4
#25 · 50 pts
Win % (no spread)
ELON @ STAN
Elon Phoenix at Stanford Cardinal
Pick
Elon Phoenix
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
71.8% (ELON)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Elon Phoenix.
Our model gives ELON a predicted 71.8% chance to win outright against STAN. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
ELON also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 50 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): STAN -4.03 vs ELON +0.00.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for STAN, 20.0% for ELON, based on games played so far) → model rating of STAN -9.06 vs ELON +0.00.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of -6.6 pts for STAN.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 28.2% STAN / 71.8% ELON (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: ELON 27.3
– STAN 20.7
#26 · 49 pts
Win % (no spread)
KU @ KSU
Kansas Jayhawks at Kansas State Wildcats
Pick
Kansas State Wildcats
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
71.7% (KSU)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Kansas State Wildcats.
Our model gives KSU a predicted 71.7% chance to win outright against KU. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
KSU also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 49 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): KSU +0.06 vs KU -0.55.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for KSU, 85.0% for KU, based on games played so far) → model rating of KSU +4.15 vs KU +0.13.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of +6.5 pts for KSU.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 71.7% KSU / 28.3% KU (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: KU 20.7
– KSU 27.3
#27 · 48 pts
Win % (no spread)
OKST @ HOU
Oklahoma State Cowboys at Houston Cougars
Pick
Houston Cougars
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
71.7% (HOU)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Houston Cougars.
Our model gives HOU a predicted 71.7% chance to win outright against OKST. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
HOU also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 48 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): HOU +1.71 vs OKST -7.25.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for HOU, 85.0% for OKST, based on games played so far) → model rating of HOU +6.70 vs OKST +2.69.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of +6.5 pts for HOU.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 71.7% HOU / 28.3% OKST (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: OKST 20.7
– HOU 27.3
#28 · 47 pts
Win % (no spread)
UNC @ DUKE
North Carolina Tar Heels at Duke Blue Devils
Pick
Duke Blue Devils
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
71.4% (DUKE)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Duke Blue Devils.
Our model gives DUKE a predicted 71.4% chance to win outright against UNC. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
DUKE also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 47 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): DUKE +1.21 vs UNC -2.95.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for DUKE, 85.0% for UNC, based on games played so far) → model rating of DUKE +4.01 vs UNC +0.09.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of +6.4 pts for DUKE.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 71.4% DUKE / 28.6% UNC (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: UNC 20.8
– DUKE 27.2
#29 · 46 pts
Win % (no spread)
WIS @ UCLA
Wisconsin Badgers at UCLA Bruins
Pick
UCLA Bruins
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
71.4% (UCLA)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking UCLA Bruins.
Our model gives UCLA a predicted 71.4% chance to win outright against WIS. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
UCLA also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 46 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): UCLA -5.48 vs WIS -3.55.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for UCLA, 85.0% for WIS, based on games played so far) → model rating of UCLA +6.00 vs WIS +2.09.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of +6.4 pts for UCLA.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 71.4% UCLA / 28.6% WIS (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: WIS 20.8
– UCLA 27.2
#30 · 45 pts
Win % (no spread)
SJSU @ UTEP
San José State Spartans at UTEP Miners
Pick
San José State Spartans
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
71.4% (SJSU)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking San José State Spartans.
Our model gives SJSU a predicted 71.4% chance to win outright against UTEP. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
SJSU also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 45 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): UTEP -4.00 vs SJSU -4.67.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for UTEP, 85.0% for SJSU, based on games played so far) → model rating of UTEP -11.94 vs SJSU -3.04.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of -6.4 pts for UTEP.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 28.6% UTEP / 71.4% SJSU (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: SJSU 27.2
– UTEP 20.8
#32 · 43 pts
Win % (no spread)
PITT @ BC
Pittsburgh Panthers at Boston College Eagles
Pick
Pittsburgh Panthers
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
70.2% (PITT)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Pittsburgh Panthers.
Our model gives PITT a predicted 70.2% chance to win outright against BC. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
PITT also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 43 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): BC -3.80 vs PITT +2.61.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for BC, 85.0% for PITT, based on games played so far) → model rating of BC -3.43 vs PITT +5.07.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of -6.0 pts for BC.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 29.8% BC / 70.2% PITT (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: PITT 27.0
– BC 21.0
#33 · 42 pts
Win % (no spread)
TLSA @ RICE
Tulsa Golden Hurricane at Rice Owls
Pick
Tulsa Golden Hurricane
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
69.6% (TLSA)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Tulsa Golden Hurricane.
Our model gives TLSA a predicted 69.6% chance to win outright against RICE. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
TLSA also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 42 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): RICE -4.38 vs TLSA -3.07.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for RICE, 85.0% for TLSA, based on games played so far) → model rating of RICE -8.47 vs TLSA -0.16.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of -5.8 pts for RICE.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 30.4% RICE / 69.6% TLSA (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: TLSA 26.9
– RICE 21.1
#34 · 41 pts
Win % (no spread)
CIT @ TA&M
The Citadel Bulldogs at Texas A&M Aggies
Pick
Texas A&M Aggies
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
69.4% (TA&M)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Texas A&M Aggies.
Our model gives TA&M a predicted 69.4% chance to win outright against CIT. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
TA&M also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 41 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): TA&M +4.69 vs CIT +0.00.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for TA&M, 40.0% for CIT, based on games played so far) → model rating of TA&M +3.22 vs CIT +0.00.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of +5.7 pts for TA&M.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 69.4% TA&M / 30.6% CIT (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: CIT 21.1
– TA&M 26.9
#35 · 40 pts
Win % (no spread)
NAVY @ UTSA
Navy Midshipmen at UTSA Roadrunners
Pick
UTSA Roadrunners
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
68.8% (UTSA)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking UTSA Roadrunners.
Our model gives UTSA a predicted 68.8% chance to win outright against NAVY. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
UTSA also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 40 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): UTSA +0.44 vs NAVY +1.84.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for UTSA, 85.0% for NAVY, based on games played so far) → model rating of UTSA +1.37 vs NAVY -1.68.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of +5.5 pts for UTSA.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 68.8% UTSA / 31.2% NAVY (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: NAVY 21.2
– UTSA 26.8
#36 · 39 pts
Win % (no spread)
TOL @ EMU
Toledo Rockets at Eastern Michigan Eagles
Pick
Toledo Rockets
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
68.7% (TOL)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Toledo Rockets.
Our model gives TOL a predicted 68.7% chance to win outright against EMU. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
TOL also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 39 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): EMU -3.01 vs TOL +4.80.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for EMU, 85.0% for TOL, based on games played so far) → model rating of EMU -4.42 vs TOL +3.59.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of -5.5 pts for EMU.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 31.3% EMU / 68.7% TOL (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: TOL 26.8
– EMU 21.2
#38 · 37 pts
Win % (no spread)
BALL @ BGSU
Ball State Cardinals at Bowling Green Falcons
Pick
Bowling Green Falcons
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
66.0% (BGSU)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Bowling Green Falcons.
Our model gives BGSU a predicted 66.0% chance to win outright against BALL. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
BGSU also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 37 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): BGSU -2.56 vs BALL -5.26.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for BGSU, 85.0% for BALL, based on games played so far) → model rating of BGSU -7.79 vs BALL -9.93.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of +4.6 pts for BGSU.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 66.0% BGSU / 34.0% BALL (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: BALL 21.7
– BGSU 26.3
#39 · 36 pts
Win % (no spread)
WMU @ CMU
Western Michigan Broncos at Central Michigan Chippewas
Pick
Western Michigan Broncos
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
65.3% (WMU)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Western Michigan Broncos.
Our model gives WMU a predicted 65.3% chance to win outright against CMU. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
WMU also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 36 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): CMU -0.38 vs WMU +1.18.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for CMU, 85.0% for WMU, based on games played so far) → model rating of CMU -5.48 vs WMU +1.43.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of -4.4 pts for CMU.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 34.7% CMU / 65.3% WMU (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: WMU 26.2
– CMU 21.8
#40 · 35 pts
Win % (no spread)
MIZ @ MISS
Missouri Tigers at Ole Miss Rebels
Pick
Ole Miss Rebels
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
64.1% (MISS)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Ole Miss Rebels.
Our model gives MISS a predicted 64.1% chance to win outright against MIZ. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
MISS also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 35 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): MISS +5.30 vs MIZ +3.25.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for MISS, 85.0% for MIZ, based on games played so far) → model rating of MISS +5.13 vs MIZ +3.58.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of +4.0 pts for MISS.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 64.1% MISS / 35.9% MIZ (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: MIZ 22.0
– MISS 26.0
#41 · 34 pts
Win % (no spread)
UVA @ SMU
Virginia Cavaliers at SMU Mustangs
Pick
SMU Mustangs
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
64.0% (SMU)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking SMU Mustangs.
Our model gives SMU a predicted 64.0% chance to win outright against UVA. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
SMU also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 34 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): SMU +3.07 vs UVA +3.22.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for SMU, 85.0% for UVA, based on games played so far) → model rating of SMU +3.78 vs UVA +2.26.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of +4.0 pts for SMU.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 64.0% SMU / 36.0% UVA (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: UVA 22.0
– SMU 26.0
#43 · 32 pts
Win % (no spread)
TCU @ BAY
TCU Horned Frogs at Baylor Bears
Pick
Baylor Bears
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
63.5% (BAY)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Baylor Bears.
Our model gives BAY a predicted 63.5% chance to win outright against TCU. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
BAY also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 32 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): BAY -1.30 vs TCU +1.33.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for BAY, 85.0% for TCU, based on games played so far) → model rating of BAY +3.75 vs TCU +2.36.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of +3.9 pts for BAY.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 63.5% BAY / 36.5% TCU (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: TCU 22.1
– BAY 25.9
#46 · 29 pts
Win % (no spread)
MEM @ TULN
Memphis Tigers at Tulane Green Wave
Pick
Memphis Tigers
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
61.6% (MEM)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Memphis Tigers.
Our model gives MEM a predicted 61.6% chance to win outright against TULN. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
MEM also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 29 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): TULN +2.17 vs MEM +2.98.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for TULN, 85.0% for MEM, based on games played so far) → model rating of TULN -2.09 vs MEM +3.72.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of -3.3 pts for TULN.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 38.4% TULN / 61.6% MEM (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: MEM 25.7
– TULN 22.3
#47 · 28 pts
Win % (no spread)
FLA @ TEX
Florida Gators at Texas Longhorns
Pick
Texas Longhorns
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
61.5% (TEX)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Texas Longhorns.
Our model gives TEX a predicted 61.5% chance to win outright against FLA. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
TEX also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 28 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): TEX +2.76 vs FLA -1.74.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for TEX, 85.0% for FLA, based on games played so far) → model rating of TEX +3.75 vs FLA +2.98.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of +3.3 pts for TEX.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 61.5% TEX / 38.5% FLA (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: FLA 22.4
– TEX 25.6
#48 · 27 pts
Win % (no spread)
ARK @ VAN
Arkansas Razorbacks at Vanderbilt Commodores
Pick
Vanderbilt Commodores
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
60.9% (VAN)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Vanderbilt Commodores.
Our model gives VAN a predicted 60.9% chance to win outright against ARK. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
VAN also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 27 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): VAN +5.17 vs ARK -1.82.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for VAN, 85.0% for ARK, based on games played so far) → model rating of VAN -3.72 vs ARK -4.33.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of +3.1 pts for VAN.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 60.9% VAN / 39.1% ARK (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: ARK 22.4
– VAN 25.6
#49 · 26 pts
Win % (no spread)
ALA @ TENN
Alabama Crimson Tide at Tennessee Volunteers
Pick
Tennessee Volunteers
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
60.2% (TENN)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Tennessee Volunteers.
Our model gives TENN a predicted 60.2% chance to win outright against ALA. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
TENN also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 26 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): TENN +3.13 vs ALA +4.03.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for TENN, 85.0% for ALA, based on games played so far) → model rating of TENN +6.53 vs ALA +6.13.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of +2.9 pts for TENN.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 60.2% TENN / 39.8% ALA (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: ALA 22.6
– TENN 25.4
#50 · 25 pts
Win % (no spread)
FRES @ SDSU
Fresno State Bulldogs at San Diego State Aztecs
Pick
Fresno State Bulldogs
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
59.9% (FRES)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Fresno State Bulldogs.
Our model gives FRES a predicted 59.9% chance to win outright against SDSU. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
FRES also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 25 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): SDSU +3.10 vs FRES +1.29.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for SDSU, 85.0% for FRES, based on games played so far) → model rating of SDSU -4.94 vs FRES +0.37.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of -2.8 pts for SDSU.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 40.1% SDSU / 59.9% FRES (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: FRES 25.4
– SDSU 22.6
#52 · 23 pts
Win % (no spread)
NEB @ ORE
Nebraska Cornhuskers at Oregon Ducks
Pick
Oregon Ducks
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
58.7% (ORE)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Oregon Ducks.
Our model gives ORE a predicted 58.7% chance to win outright against NEB. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
NEB grades out as the stronger team by rating alone, but ORE is at home, and a 2.5-point home-field edge is enough to flip our model's win probability in their favor.
This pick is worth 23 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): ORE +7.02 vs NEB +1.19.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for ORE, 85.0% for NEB, based on games played so far) → model rating of ORE +6.06 vs NEB +6.12.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of +2.4 pts for ORE.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 58.7% ORE / 41.3% NEB (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: NEB 22.8
– ORE 25.2
#53 · 22 pts
Win % (no spread)
OSU @ IU
Ohio State Buckeyes at Indiana Hoosiers
Pick
Indiana Hoosiers
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
58.3% (IU)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Indiana Hoosiers.
Our model gives IU a predicted 58.3% chance to win outright against OSU. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
OSU grades out as the stronger team by rating alone, but IU is at home, and a 2.5-point home-field edge is enough to flip our model's win probability in their favor.
This pick is worth 22 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): IU +9.42 vs OSU +7.92.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for IU, 85.0% for OSU, based on games played so far) → model rating of IU +9.57 vs OSU +9.72.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of +2.3 pts for IU.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 58.3% IU / 41.7% OSU (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: OSU 22.8
– IU 25.2
#54 · 21 pts
Win % (no spread)
PSU @ MICH
Penn State Nittany Lions at Michigan Wolverines
Pick
Michigan Wolverines
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
58.3% (MICH)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Michigan Wolverines.
Our model gives MICH a predicted 58.3% chance to win outright against PSU. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
PSU grades out as the stronger team by rating alone, but MICH is at home, and a 2.5-point home-field edge is enough to flip our model's win probability in their favor.
This pick is worth 21 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): MICH +2.52 vs PSU +2.15.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for MICH, 85.0% for PSU, based on games played so far) → model rating of MICH +1.16 vs PSU +1.31.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of +2.3 pts for MICH.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 58.3% MICH / 41.7% PSU (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: PSU 22.8
– MICH 25.2
#56 · 19 pts
Win % (no spread)
CHSO @ CLEM
Charleston Southern Buccaneers at Clemson Tigers
Pick
Clemson Tigers
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
57.0% (CLEM)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Clemson Tigers.
Our model gives CLEM a predicted 57.0% chance to win outright against CHSO. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
CHSO grades out as the stronger team by rating alone, but CLEM is at home, and a 2.5-point home-field edge is enough to flip our model's win probability in their favor.
This pick is worth 19 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): CLEM +1.68 vs CHSO +0.00.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for CLEM, 40.0% for CHSO, based on games played so far) → model rating of CLEM -0.54 vs CHSO +0.00.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of +2.0 pts for CLEM.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 57.0% CLEM / 43.0% CHSO (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: CHSO 23.0
– CLEM 25.0
#57 · 18 pts
Win % (no spread)
ARST @ USM
Arkansas State Red Wolves at Southern Miss Golden Eagles
Pick
Arkansas State Red Wolves
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
56.4% (ARST)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Arkansas State Red Wolves.
Our model gives ARST a predicted 56.4% chance to win outright against USM. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
ARST also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 18 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): USM +0.04 vs ARST -1.70.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for USM, 85.0% for ARST, based on games played so far) → model rating of USM -6.70 vs ARST -2.40.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of -1.8 pts for USM.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 43.6% USM / 56.4% ARST (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: ARST 24.9
– USM 23.1
#58 · 17 pts
Win % (no spread)
LOU @ SYR
Louisville Cardinals at Syracuse Orange
Pick
Louisville Cardinals
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
56.3% (LOU)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Louisville Cardinals.
Our model gives LOU a predicted 56.3% chance to win outright against SYR. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
LOU also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 17 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): SYR -5.39 vs LOU +2.35.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for SYR, 85.0% for LOU, based on games played so far) → model rating of SYR -1.36 vs LOU +2.90.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of -1.8 pts for SYR.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 43.7% SYR / 56.3% LOU (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: LOU 24.9
– SYR 23.1
#60 · 15 pts
Win % (no spread)
APP @ CCU
App State Mountaineers at Coastal Carolina Chanticleers
Pick
App State Mountaineers
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
55.9% (APP)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking App State Mountaineers.
Our model gives APP a predicted 55.9% chance to win outright against CCU. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
APP also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 15 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): CCU -3.80 vs APP -2.44.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for CCU, 85.0% for APP, based on games played so far) → model rating of CCU -3.67 vs APP +0.49.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of -1.7 pts for CCU.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 44.1% CCU / 55.9% APP (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: APP 24.8
– CCU 23.2
#61 · 14 pts
Win % (no spread)
WKU @ SHSU
Western Kentucky Hilltoppers at Sam Houston Bearkats
Pick
Sam Houston Bearkats
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
55.4% (SHSU)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Sam Houston Bearkats.
Our model gives SHSU a predicted 55.4% chance to win outright against WKU. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
WKU grades out as the stronger team by rating alone, but SHSU is at home, and a 2.5-point home-field edge is enough to flip our model's win probability in their favor.
This pick is worth 14 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): SHSU -7.42 vs WKU +1.37.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for SHSU, 85.0% for WKU, based on games played so far) → model rating of SHSU -6.47 vs WKU -5.49.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of +1.5 pts for SHSU.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 55.4% SHSU / 44.6% WKU (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: WKU 23.2
– SHSU 24.8
#62 · 13 pts
Win % (no spread)
ECU @ UAB
East Carolina Pirates at UAB Blazers
Pick
UAB Blazers
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
54.9% (UAB)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking UAB Blazers.
Our model gives UAB a predicted 54.9% chance to win outright against ECU. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
ECU grades out as the stronger team by rating alone, but UAB is at home, and a 2.5-point home-field edge is enough to flip our model's win probability in their favor.
This pick is worth 13 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): UAB -4.39 vs ECU +3.26.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for UAB, 85.0% for ECU, based on games played so far) → model rating of UAB -3.11 vs ECU -1.99.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of +1.4 pts for UAB.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 54.9% UAB / 45.1% ECU (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: ECU 23.3
– UAB 24.7
#65 · 10 pts
Win % (no spread)
WASH @ PUR
Washington Huskies at Purdue Boilermakers
Pick
Washington Huskies
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
53.6% (WASH)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Washington Huskies.
Our model gives WASH a predicted 53.6% chance to win outright against PUR. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
WASH also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 10 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): PUR -5.21 vs WASH +3.61.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for PUR, 85.0% for WASH, based on games played so far) → model rating of PUR -3.04 vs WASH +0.48.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of -1.0 pts for PUR.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 46.4% PUR / 53.6% WASH (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: WASH 24.5
– PUR 23.5
#66 · 9 pts
Win % (no spread)
RUTG @ MD
Rutgers Scarlet Knights at Maryland Terrapins
Pick
Maryland Terrapins
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
53.6% (MD)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Maryland Terrapins.
Our model gives MD a predicted 53.6% chance to win outright against RUTG. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
RUTG grades out as the stronger team by rating alone, but MD is at home, and a 2.5-point home-field edge is enough to flip our model's win probability in their favor.
This pick is worth 9 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): MD -2.22 vs RUTG -1.68.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for MD, 85.0% for RUTG, based on games played so far) → model rating of MD -4.64 vs RUTG -3.15.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of +1.0 pts for MD.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 53.6% MD / 46.4% RUTG (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: RUTG 23.5
– MD 24.5
#67 · 8 pts
Win % (no spread)
GASO @ ODU
Georgia Southern Eagles at Old Dominion Monarchs
Pick
Georgia Southern Eagles
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
53.0% (GASO)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Georgia Southern Eagles.
Our model gives GASO a predicted 53.0% chance to win outright against ODU. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
GASO also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 8 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): ODU +3.59 vs GASO -2.42.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for ODU, 85.0% for GASO, based on games played so far) → model rating of ODU -5.57 vs GASO -2.22.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of -0.8 pts for ODU.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 47.0% ODU / 53.0% GASO (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: GASO 24.4
– ODU 23.6
#70 · 5 pts
Win % (no spread)
CIN @ WVU
Cincinnati Bearcats at West Virginia Mountaineers
Pick
Cincinnati Bearcats
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
50.8% (CIN)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Cincinnati Bearcats.
Our model gives CIN a predicted 50.8% chance to win outright against WVU. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
CIN also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 5 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): WVU -3.60 vs CIN +1.46.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for WVU, 85.0% for CIN, based on games played so far) → model rating of WVU -0.70 vs CIN +2.02.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of -0.2 pts for WVU.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 49.2% WVU / 50.8% CIN (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: CIN 24.1
– WVU 23.9
#71 · 4 pts
Win % (no spread)
UK @ OU
Kentucky Wildcats at Oklahoma Sooners
Pick
Oklahoma Sooners
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
50.6% (OU)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Oklahoma Sooners.
Our model gives OU a predicted 50.6% chance to win outright against UK. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
UK grades out as the stronger team by rating alone, but OU is at home, and a 2.5-point home-field edge is enough to flip our model's win probability in their favor.
This pick is worth 4 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): OU +3.83 vs UK -1.78.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for OU, 85.0% for UK, based on games played so far) → model rating of OU -0.27 vs UK +2.06.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of +0.2 pts for OU.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 50.6% OU / 49.4% UK (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: UK 23.9
– OU 24.1
#72 · 3 pts
Win % (no spread)
KENN @ MOST
Kennesaw State Owls at Missouri State Bears
Pick
Missouri State Bears
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
50.6% (MOST)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Missouri State Bears.
Our model gives MOST a predicted 50.6% chance to win outright against KENN. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
KENN grades out as the stronger team by rating alone, but MOST is at home, and a 2.5-point home-field edge is enough to flip our model's win probability in their favor.
This pick is worth 3 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): MOST -1.29 vs KENN +1.22.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for MOST, 85.0% for KENN, based on games played so far) → model rating of MOST -6.21 vs KENN -3.87.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of +0.2 pts for MOST.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 50.6% MOST / 49.4% KENN (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: KENN 23.9
– MOST 24.1
#73 · 2 pts
Win % (no spread)
ND @ BYU
Notre Dame Fighting Irish at BYU Cougars
Pick
Notre Dame Fighting Irish
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
50.5% (ND)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Notre Dame Fighting Irish.
Our model gives ND a predicted 50.5% chance to win outright against BYU. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
ND also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 2 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): BYU +4.13 vs ND +7.02.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for BYU, 85.0% for ND, based on games played so far) → model rating of BYU +7.52 vs ND +10.15.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of -0.1 pts for BYU.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 49.5% BYU / 50.5% ND (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: ND 24.1
– BYU 23.9
#74 · 1 pts
Win % (no spread)
MASS @ BUFF
Massachusetts Minutemen at Buffalo Bulls
Pick
Massachusetts Minutemen
Splash
—
Win % (no spread)
50.5% (MASS)
No sportsbook spread available for this game; fell back to straight-up win probability.
Basic reasoning
▾
We're picking Massachusetts Minutemen.
Our model gives MASS a predicted 50.5% chance to win outright against BUFF. No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so the pick is based on who's more likely to win outright.
MASS also grades out as the better team this season, which backs up the pick.
This pick is worth 1 confidence points this week — the more points assigned, the more confident the model is.
Reasoning & ESPN stats
▾
Reasoning
- Regressed preseason ratings from the 2025 season, pulled toward league-average (regression retains 65% of the raw historical rating): BUFF -1.16 vs MASS -10.04.
- Blended with this season's to-date rating (85.0% weight for BUFF, 85.0% for MASS, based on games played so far) → model rating of BUFF -3.30 vs MASS -0.67.
- Add home-field edge (~+2.50 pts) → predicted margin of -0.1 pts for BUFF.
- Predicted margin converts to a straight-up win probability of 49.5% BUFF / 50.5% MASS (source: ESPN model).
- No sportsbook spread was available for this game, so ATS probability could not be computed.
- Decision basis: straight-up fallback — requested ATS mode but no spread was available for this game.
Projected score: MASS 24.1
– BUFF 23.9